3 ms·
The title was (automatically) taken from the web page title defined by the journal itself. It seems to me to have substantially the same meaning as the article
by leephillips 9y ago
The title was (automatically) taken from the web page title defined by the journal itself. It seems to me to have substantially the same meaning as the article title.
- nerdponx 9y agoNo. An "association" is not a "benefit". It can suggest or even imply a benefit, but they are not the same thing. The former is the result of the study, the latter is misleading and incorrect. I feel like I need a picture of Bart Simpson writing "correlation does not imply causation" on a blackboard to post on these occasions.
- leephillips 9y agoNow try reading the article. The authors argue for causation in many places, suggesting what they feel are plausible mechanisms. Again, the title is not deceptive, deliberately or otherwise.