2 ms·
I don't view the dev's change in narrative from p2p cash to store of value as a positive development. Neither is their fetish with decentralization. Frankly I
by pmorici 9y ago
I don't view the dev's change in narrative from p2p cash to store of value as a positive development. Neither is their fetish with decentralization. Frankly I think their refusal to hard fork an increased block size opened the playing field to several other contenders. I think the bottom line is that we need practical approaches and solutions not some over designed perfect solution that is 3 years away.
- Frogolocalypse 9y agoNodes are the peers in peer-to-peer cash. Only if you run a node are you a peer. And that is why bitcoin crushes all competitors. Its node infrastructure. And that is why block size increases beyond segwit have been resisted. To protect that infrastructure and advantage.