10 ms·
We need more judges like him to make the judiciary functional.
by labster 9y ago
We need more judges like him to make the judiciary functional.
- throwaway613834 9y agoIndeed. Getting more judges like him at the bench may well be our greatest imperative.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- quickthrower2 9y agoHe will make some fine hypothetical judgements.
- throwaway613834 9y agoJudging from the downvotes on your comment, I think some fellow HN'ers have failed to make the correct inference as to its meaning (!)...
- quickthrower2 9y agoIt's ok. I'm not Heyting them. I'll let them through the turnstile into my Church
- thesmallestcat 9y agoWe can only hope that he has read through the applicative rulings.
- throwaway613834 9y agoYeah, contradictory rulings could seriously disrupt the normal order.
- ben_jones 9y agoBetter then the current system that objectifies the working class.
- throwaway613834 9y agoWe've come quite a long way though. At least it's not like back in the old days where saying the wrong thing could lead to your head getting detached.
- schindlabua 9y agoRuling the wrong way in tech cases may otherwise have unintended side-effects.
- throwaway613834 9y agoThankfully we don't have to worry about that. Just look at Oracle v. Google -- he considered the entire environment in which the code was written and didn't evaluate the case solely based on the arguments.
- dang 9y agoWe detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15835430 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15835430 and marked it off-topic.
- throwaway613834 9y agoIt's funny... I've only ever seen processes get detached from their parents, not threads.
- labster 9y agoIt's really too bad that the idea of a useful judiciary is off-topic on HN.