4 ms·
Pardon my ignorance but I thought Apple largely obeyed the law. Shouldn’t these people be protesting the government that fails to tax Apple justly?
by PrimalDual 9y ago
Pardon my ignorance but I thought Apple largely obeyed the law. Shouldn’t these people be protesting the government that fails to tax Apple justly?
- Joakal 9y ago> “Apple must stop denying the tax practices highlighted by the European Commission’s investigation, withdraw its appeal to the European Court of Justice and pay its fine of 13 billion euros as quickly as possible,” said Aurélie Trouvé, spokesman for Attac, according to the release. A blurb from article. It looks like the government already went after Apple.
- devereaux 9y agoThe protesters may not want to let justice run its course.
- icebraining 9y agoThey sound misinformed. The 13 billion euros is not a fine, it's back taxes that the EU says Apple should have paid to Ireland. Yes, this is relevant; Apple is not being punished¹, they're just being told to fulfill their obligations. ¹I'm not saying they should or shouldn't be.
- toyg 9y agoPotato, potahto. Apple must pay and Ireland must collect, dropping their insulting appeal. Whether it's a fine or backdated taxes is relatively irrelevant at this point.
- westiseast 9y agoIreland allowed Apple a loophole where they were incorporated there, but non-resident, and therefore no tax. It was a sweetheart deal and Ireland got jobs and investment. The EU said no, wants the back tax to be paid.
- petre 9y agoRetroactive taxes and tax regulation? It's too bad the EU officials did not think about that loophole before it was abused.
- owebmaster 9y agoNot too bad, you just go after the abusers. Why not?
- soVeryTired 9y agoThey did think about it. The law says "No state aid for companies", and the ruling says Ireland gave state aid.
- petre 9y agoThen Ireland should be fined.
- ringtail 9y agoThe rule applied to every company. Its not even hard. Its as simple as it can get. Hows that state aid ?