4 ms·
>More would be accomplished by protesting the government that allows certain loopholes. I'm not so sure about this as I'd question that it's possible for a sin
by bauerd 9y ago
>More would be accomplished by protesting the government that allows certain loopholes.
I'm not so sure about this as I'd question that it's possible for a single government to close loopholes on its own. Arguably yes, governments should be pressured into closing "certain loopholes", but not because this necessarily leads to a better outcome.
>Apple is a public company with an obligation to its shareholders to make money
Not everyone agrees that companies ought to maximise only shareholder value.
- xiphias 9y agoShareholder value and making money are not the same thing (and the job of the CEO is to maximize shareholder value, not money). I'm a Tesla shareholder, and I would be quite disappointed if the company would stop caring about scaled sustainability and would just stay as a luxury car brand (which would make it easy for Tesla to not lose money on research).
- humanrebar 9y ago> I'm not so sure about this as I'd question that it's possible for a single government to close loopholes on its own. That's the argument against signing global warming treaties, isn't it?
- bauerd 9y agoIt's not an argument against closing loopholes.