4 ms·

This would depend on the field, right? Ie in some fields are there possibly more jobs outside of academia (than within) that require a PhD, alleviating the pre

• philwelch 9y ago
  There are few jobs outside of academia where postgraduate degrees in liberal arts are a meaningful qualification. STEM can be hit or miss—a physics or math Ph.D. may be highly employable, but not especially more than someone with similar talent and ambition who invested their time in more marketable experience. If I were the federal budget czar, I would literally pump tens to hundreds of billions of dollars into opening national labs and hiring these STEM postgrads to do basic research. Figuring out how to efficiently produce something like high-temperature superconductors, carbon nanotubes, fusion power, carbon sequestration, gene therapy, etc. would solve some very fundamental problems, likely produce a huge return on investment, and gainfully employ thousands of highly educated people who are woefully underutilized. Even less outwardly ambitious research can produce value: look at what happened when the federal government wanted to build a more resilient computer network for DARPA. But I’m not that czar, and I think subsidizing people into career dead ends is something we could stand to do less of.