3 ms·
On the one hand, you are right. On the other hand, it is still troubling. Also, I get the impression that the supreme court is tired of basically having to ma
by krylon 9y ago
On the one hand, you are right.
On the other hand, it is still troubling.
Also, I get the impression that the supreme court is tired of basically having to make policy by invalidating unconstitutional laws.
If there were serious consequences for politicians and members of parliament for creating unconstitutional laws, maybe they would think twice before doing that. But of course, the people who would have to put such sanctions in place are the very people who would be affected by them, so that is not going to happen. :(
- Sylos 9y agoI'm not happy either with this surveillance freak in a position with publicity. No matter how sure I am that his political attempts will fail again and again, with him repeating this bullshit over and over people are actually starting to believe things like that we need surveillance cameras to stop terrorism, even though surveillance cameras really can do fuckall about a guy hiding a bomb under his jacket and then blowing himself up or someone driving a van into a group of people. Not to mention that this guy is actively helping out terrorists with that. He's spreading terror. He's making citizens here worry quite a bit, even though there's no real reason to be worried. You're a hundred times more likely to die of all kinds of things every day. There is no point being worried about terrorists.