3 ms·

Good tip, but while it works in this specific case, it isn't generally equivalent. "for of" works on anything that is iterable. This will only work on array-lik

by vkjv 9y ago

Good tip, but while it works in this specific case, it isn't generally equivalent. "for of" works on anything that is iterable. This will only work on array-like objects.

deleted 9y ago
[deleted]
Klathmon 9y ago
And the major reason I use for-of is because you can `await` within a loop easily.
- Maarten88 9y ago
  Awaiting in a loop usually is not a good idea. Map with Promise.all / any is probably much faster. edit: now reading about for..await..of. Interesting, I never used that.
  - Klathmon 9y ago
    Even outside of for..await..of you still need to do async things inside a synchronous-like loop.