3 ms·
10.0, 10.1, 10.2 were all terrible. 10.3 on got better, but you continually have had these horrible pre x.x.3 releases that have been show stoppers. I won't ev
by justherefortart 9y ago
10.0, 10.1, 10.2 were all terrible. 10.3 on got better, but you continually have had these horrible pre x.x.3 releases that have been show stoppers.
I won't even touch Mac OS until it's past the 3rd revision. Reminds me of old Windows where you waited for SP3.
- StringyBob 9y agoSomewhere between ios9 and 10.3 on an iphone6 things got noticably slower e.g. pauses lasting multiple seconds while doing things like scrolling. I suspected the filesystem update, but could be anything. Apple are forward looking in development - meaning they don't seem to be doing much regression testing for things like performance with last years model - or if they are, they don't care. I'm not letting ios11 anywhere near my phone based on the usability impact I've seen on others, which leaves me open to old security vulnerabilities. Microsoft security patch old operating system versions - its kinda ironic how the 2 companies have switched places.
- ghostcluster 9y ago10.0, 10.1, and 10.2 never shipped with these kind of issues: http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Sep-23-2017-12-41-55.gif http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Sep-23... (from the Ars High Sierra review) That's the kind of thing Apple made fun of Windows Vista for in the Get a Mac ads.
- justherefortart 9y agoYea because no one was using them. Everyone was still on 9.2. OS X sucked horribly until 10.2 and wasn't decent IMO until 10.3.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]