3 ms·
Perhaps they meant false equivalence? Although it’s not quite that either.
by psyc 9y ago
Perhaps they meant false equivalence? Although it’s not quite that either.
- CalChris 9y agoThanks, I used this opportunity to actually look up equivocation and it wasn't quite what I meant. I'm not sure what the exact word should be. False equivalence is close. My point is that while they disagree, these two sides are not equivalent in their approach to logic and fact. They are only being made to seem equivalent.
- anon11082016 9y agoI'm really glad five generations down, your condescension was finally comprehended. I don't get how people can walk around so spiteful.