11 ms·
He's not broken. Something about your argument tugs at the very foundation of his identity. By attacking something so close (what ever it is) to his identity he
by iovrthoughtthis 9y ago
He's not broken. Something about your argument tugs at the very foundation of his identity. By attacking something so close (what ever it is) to his identity he percieves it as personal.
Food for thought
- pjc50 9y agoWould that identity be "I'm right all the time regardless of the actual facts"? I see that a lot :(
- iovrthoughtthis 9y agoIt could be! Especially as the child. The whole Protective Parent vision of oneself may well exist. Accepting the child being right would damage that.