I think the state did prove it. For certain cases, you don't have a right to trial by jury, such as bail revocation. And often it is decided on a preponderance

I think the state did prove it. For certain cases, you don't have a right to trial by jury, such as bail revocation. And often it is decided on a preponderance of the evidence standard. I don't know the specifics of bail revocation case law, but there are worse known cases, like contempt of court. Martin Armstrong was held for years, the All Writs act is being use as an anti-encryption measure, etc.