4 ms·
But realistically they won't be able to build an unlimited amount of houses. So in your example let's say they're suddenly allowed to build 10000 cars, an order
by himlion 9y ago
But realistically they won't be able to build an unlimited amount of houses. So in your example let's say they're suddenly allowed to build 10000 cars, an order of magnitude increase. I think those 10.000 will still be just Lexuses.
I agree with the sentiment that luxury apartments is a start/ better than nothing, but I think the benefits for the lower end of the housing is overstated.
- dionidium 9y ago"But realistically they won't be able to build an unlimited amount of houses" Unlimited is quite the stretch goal, but, frankly, why not? We've done it before. San Francisco doesn't need to be Midtown Manhattan to drastically increase its population. It just needs to look like most of Queens (or Brooklyn, which would be even better). We've built Queens before. We've built Brooklyn before. It's not impossible, assuming you don't make it illegal.
- jstanley 9y agoIf all they're building is Lexuses, the problem isn't that they're allowed to build too many cars and therefore you shouldn't let them build more. The problem is that they're not allowed to build enough cars.