It's not a question of what medium will make me more likely to say shit. It's a question of whether my choice of that medium should be, de facto, considered inc

It's not a question of what medium will make me more likely to say shit. It's a question of whether my choice of that medium should be, de facto, considered incriminating. It's a question of whether a company can ask its employees to use ephemeral mediums to communicate. See, if we get down to brass tacks, I personally would be willing to put my money on Uber being guilty as sin. But that doesn't mean that I think a company should not be allowed to ask employees to prefer a confidential or ephemeral medium of communication.