4 ms·
Maybe he provided proof of that... maybe it was just his understanding? Legal departments know it's impossible to be 100.00% legal (who has never trespassed a
by weddpros 9y ago
Maybe he provided proof of that... maybe it was just his understanding?
Legal departments know it's impossible to be 100.00% legal (who has never trespassed a single law?), and they're tasked with avoiding any legal risk. To them, it's probably just risk mitigation to ask employees to avoid leaving unnecessary evidence.
- Spooky23 9y agoThere’s a line between managing risk and abetting. Uber likes to push or cross boundaries in many other areas, so it stands to reason that perhaps they did that here.
- weddpros 9y agoExcept if they can be found guilty because of suppositions. I guess it's just a case where the law makes no sense: you can't prove you've innocently suggested to use a secure communication tool for the right reasons, so there will always be a doubt about your sincerity.
- Spooky23 9y agoIt’s more like when you claim that you don’t remember anything, but the investigators find out that the email trail (which jogged your memory) mysteriously stops at a time when you are suspected to have engaged in illegal activity. Then the investigators find that email stopped when you decided to use a “secure” messenger tool that automatically self-destructs messages. What inference would any rational human draw?