3 ms·
I'm not defending "code-is-law" as a valid solution to this, but wouldn't a smart contract require the cash (crypto) to be sent in before allocating equity? The
by seibelj 9y ago
I'm not defending "code-is-law" as a valid solution to this, but wouldn't a smart contract require the cash (crypto) to be sent in before allocating equity? The issue in this situation is that no money was ever wired. In a smart contract, that means the "invest" function would not be executed and the "equity tokens" not assigned.
- khuey 9y agoYes, it would. In the real world requiring "payment up front" for all contracts isn't really feasible. A lot of low-margin businesses live or die on the cash flow terms of their contracts.