3 ms·

1) Why do you think that? Has any car ever been successfully test in traffic for long periods of time without human intervention. 2) Better than the worst isn'

• Eridrus 9y ago
  Cruise Automation reported 6 disengagements over 2200 miles of downtown SF driving last November: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/wcm/connect/deade5b7-5b10-4b25-a926-78484dbc2b31/GMCruise_disengage_report_2016.pdf?MOD=AJPERES https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/wcm/connect/deade5b7-5b10-4b25... Waymo was reporting 0.2 disengagements per 1000 miles last year, but people like to nit pick those because they're not all downtown miles. For context humans have 0.006 accidents per 1000 miles driven, and that's counting all the simple miles we drive on highways. So last year Waymo was within a factor of 30 of average human performance, assuming each disengagement was an accident. If you allow for the fact that with so few disengagements, some of this is noise, and that most of these disengagements would probably not result in accidents, but are rather drivers being cautious and the cars are probably better a year later, I'd say they're probably knocking on the door of human safety at least. Obviously hard to really say without more data, but the data makes me bullish rather than bearish.