Its probably just nscd that is caching dns requests on debian not glibc. Though I thought nscd dns ttl caching was broken there. I could be wrong. Musl libc's

Its probably just nscd that is caching dns requests on debian not glibc. Though I thought nscd dns ttl caching was broken there. I could be wrong. Musl libc's dns strategy should actually be faster than glibc when its used. https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Name-Resolver/DNS https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc... That said a local cache would be ideal.