4 ms·
That's not what's typically been happening. In most cases, at least when considering the higher-profile ones of the last few weeks, stories have been about mul
by whafro 9y ago
That's not what's typically been happening.
In most cases, at least when considering the higher-profile ones of the last few weeks, stories have been about multiple occurrences. The reporting typically identifies a pattern of behavior from multiple sources who were confirmed to have told friends, family, or colleagues at the time of the incident.
If a single, unverifiable account was thought to be sufficient, I'd be with you. But when you have multiple occurrences and patterns, you can argue that it's clear that the person is creating a toxic work environment and can be dealt with more swiftly than the legal process.
- jfk13 9y ago> If a single, unverifiable account was thought to be sufficient, I'd be with you. My understanding (based, I admit, on a brief reading of the BBC's report, so maybe there's lots more I haven't seen) of the MPR/Garrison Keillor case seems like an example of that.
- indubitable 9y agoSteve Jurvetson's case is also based on a single account. Granted his decision to step down was his, but it exemplifies the power of the accuser.