3 ms·
No not really, this isn't generation for the sake of classification. It's generation in order to generate a dataset to train a new network that exhibits the cha
by ac2u 9y ago
No not really, this isn't generation for the sake of classification. It's generation in order to generate a dataset to train a new network that exhibits the characteristics of the network in the paper that can be used quickly and in a more general fashion.
- wonderous 9y agoMeaning that your assumption is that there is an optimal generalized network structure for generate a neural network as described in the paper and that as such, what is missing from the research is how to create an optimal way to generate a malformed source/target seed. Is that correct?
- ac2u 9y agoI'm not suggesting it's missing from the research as I don't have anywhere near the area of expertise to make that call. But you're correct in your summary: I'm wondering if that's a possible follow up.