3 ms·
> If you’re writing a kernel, you’ll almost certainly be using “-nostdlib” (or your compiler’s equivalent) so unique_ptr, etc. won’t be there. Huh? unique_ptr
by throwaway613834 9y ago
> If you’re writing a kernel, you’ll almost certainly be using “-nostdlib” (or your compiler’s equivalent) so unique_ptr, etc. won’t be there.
Huh? unique_ptr has a customizable Deleter though; you should be able to provide a custom one so it doesn't call delete.
And doesn't a kernel implement a kmalloc() or something anyway? You would just write your own operator new and have it do what your kernel needs, and the rest of the standard library would just work with it.
- johncolanduoni 9y agoTrue, but the "rest of the standard library" is somewhat harder to port and last time I played with it (admittedly some years ago) no compilers were good at letting you pick and choose.