7 ms·
https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/blob/series/7.3.x/tests/src/test/scala/scalaz/BitraverseTest.scala#L41-L45 https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/blob/series/7.3.x/t
by KirinDave 9y ago
https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/blob/series/7.3.x/tests/src/test/scala/scalaz/BitraverseTest.scala#L41-L45 https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/blob/series/7.3.x/tests/src...
It is a mystery.
- pimeys 9y agoI'm not the biggest fan of Scala, but for me it's more that it reminds me of Java than the functional constructs. But pointing at Scalaz is a bit ridiculous. It's a known test library for trying things out and basically not allowed in any Scala codebase I've been working on.
- KirinDave 9y agoScalaz is widely used and widely panned. Even though I'm a haskell and purescript programmer that prefers to write <$> and >>=, I find Scala's approach frustrating and hard to read. Especially as type lambdas stack up. I'm just saying; the impression exists for a reason and the reason is a popular and well-known library.
- pimeys 9y agoI'm all with you here. I prefer Haskell and OCaml every time over Scala.