4 ms·
Wouldn't it make more sense just to fix the URL bar to make data URIs look different? You could even go to the extreme of making it just show "data:…" and requi
by eridius 9y ago
Wouldn't it make more sense just to fix the URL bar to make data URIs look different? You could even go to the extreme of making it just show "data:…" and requiring you to put focus on it to find out the full URI.
- userbinator 9y agoNo kidding... this is a problem they created by hiding/obfuscating the URL scheme. If the majority of URLs you visit start with http:// http:// or https:// https://, then data: stands out like the proverbial sore thumb.
- beefhash 9y agoThat requires that you know what you're doing, though. Non-technical people are probably more inclined to think along the lines of "huh, odd, but everything looks fine, so it's probably my fault it looks like that"
- ascorbic 9y agoIn that case why bother with using a data url at all? They could just use "www.paypal.com.cgi-bin.webscr.xxxxxxxxx.myevilsite.com"
- jchw 9y agoDid they hide it? I see "https://" https://" in my Firefox.
- daveFNbuck 9y agoThey show https:// https:// but they hide http:// http://
- jchw 9y agoOh, I honestly would've missed this, because so few sites I browse are in cleartext anymore. They may as well just display a giant "INSECURE" banner, instead of http:// http://, though.
- Vinnl 9y agoThey will, and they already do if that page includes a password form field :)
- johnp_ 9y agoFWIW, this recently landed in Firefox Nightly: security.insecure_connection_icon.enabled security.insecure_connection_icon.pbmode.enabled Though it's still disabled by default (currently the insecure connection icon is only shown if a password field is present on a http page / the form action url is http).