> So they have about a year of runway right now. I think that assumes their burn rate will not increase. Which, historically, is not the case. At their current

> So they have about a year of runway right now. I think that assumes their burn rate will not increase. Which, historically, is not the case. At their current increase of burn, assuming it is linear, they're probably looking at less than a year. Maybe even as little as 9 months.