The issue is the specific mechanism for distribution--taking wealth from people. Another mechanism would be taking proceeds from natural resources, or improving

The issue is the specific mechanism for distribution--taking wealth from people. Another mechanism would be taking proceeds from natural resources, or improving education to enable a broader range of people to succeed in the market. My point isn't that these are better options, just that redistribution is not the only kind of distribution. My issue with this article is that it claims a fund mechanism makes the inequality problem simpler, but it is still subject to all of the same problems that plague the existing redistribution schemes.