Looks like a clear case of dubious copyright claims OR that they got the free stock images and music from a website that actually didn't have the correct rights

Looks like a clear case of dubious copyright claims OR that they got the free stock images and music from a website that actually didn't have the correct rights for the media? This is a case that free stock footage and audio from the internet will get you in trouble even though you did everything right on your end. The channel maybe was penalized for what a website did? http://climatestate.com/2017/03/11/great-list-of-dubious-copyright-claims-for-climate-change-awareness-video-content/ http://climatestate.com/2017/03/11/great-list-of-dubious-cop...