4 ms·
>I'd like to point out a HUGE fallacy in this "simple" plan -- it only works in low population high natural capital resource areas. Alaska and Norway happen to
by frgtpsswrdlame 9y ago
>I'd like to point out a HUGE fallacy in this "simple" plan -- it only works in low population high natural capital resource areas. Alaska and Norway happen to be relatively remote/cold places with an abundance natural gas/oil. Norway's 1T dollar fund would be comical at US scale.
What makes natural resources different from capital such that these wealth funds work with natural resources but not capital?
- mljoe 9y agoProbably something to do with the rent seeking problem. It’s wealth tied mostly to possessing rights to exploit valuable land, not to the labor or ingenuity of people.
- holograham 9y agothis ^ Value is value -- for sure but Value derived from luck of the draw (e.g. Norway's current citizens banking on their ancestors settling in a land rich in oil). Frame it this way -- would Saudi Arabia be as wealthy as it is today without Oil? Do you think their social and political structure would have produced equivalent wealth as their oil companies?