4 ms·

Linux 2.6.32 will be quite outdated upon release, I hope they will make a squeeze 'n half like they did for Etch. Also, I hope python 2.6 will be enough for th

Linux 2.6.32 will be quite outdated upon release, I hope they will make a squeeze 'n half like they did for Etch. Also, I hope python 2.6 will be enough for the Squeeze lifetime, as python 2.7 is stable now. Python 2.5 on Lenny (while 2.6 was already released) was problematic in term of lacking features.

avar 16y ago
They're also shipping Perl from the three year old 5.10 branch, instead of the 4 month old 5.12.
- jolan 16y ago
  That's why the nickname for stable is stale.
  - Dunbar 16y ago
    Which could be construed as a synonym for hardened.
catch23 16y ago
There's always backports.org :-) I'm surprised how many debian users don't know about backports. The packages there are quite stable and is useful for the one or two things you need updated versions of.
- jolan 16y ago
  and http://www.dotdeb.org/ http://www.dotdeb.org/ for php/mysql and http://debian.dc-uoit.net/debian-multimedia/ http://debian.dc-uoit.net/debian-multimedia/ for an ffmpeg that has modernish codecs
hga 16y ago
Which kernel was a bit tricky for squeeze (note that the below is based on old and perhaps out of date research): First of course they wanted to start with a stable enough one; I remember them passing over one possibility (.31???) because it wasn't very good in their and many other people's opinion. This will be the last version of Debian that supports a Xen DomU with a patched kernel vs. pv_ops; in theory pv_ops DomU will be sufficiently solid by the following release. Doing a solid merge of the code even with the SUSE foundation is non-trivial (Xen supplies it as patches to 2.6.18). I pay attention to this because some of what I do is with or on Xen and Debian lenny was the best DomU solution for me when I started.
- Cabal 16y ago
  I think you meant forward-ported Dom0 patches. Lenny already supported DomU operation without modification.
  - hga 16y ago
    Yes, yes, I spazzed 0 -> U. Thanks for the correction.

avar 16y ago

They're also shipping Perl from the three year old 5.10 branch, instead of the 4 month old 5.12.

jolan 16y ago
That's why the nickname for stable is stale.
- Dunbar 16y ago
  Which could be construed as a synonym for hardened.

catch23 16y ago

There's always backports.org :-) I'm surprised how many debian users don't know about backports. The packages there are quite stable and is useful for the one or two things you need updated versions of.

jolan 16y ago
and http://www.dotdeb.org/ http://www.dotdeb.org/ for php/mysql and http://debian.dc-uoit.net/debian-multimedia/ http://debian.dc-uoit.net/debian-multimedia/ for an ffmpeg that has modernish codecs

hga 16y ago

Which kernel was a bit tricky for squeeze (note that the below is based on old and perhaps out of date research): First of course they wanted to start with a stable enough one; I remember them passing over one possibility (.31???) because it wasn't very good in their and many other people's opinion. This will be the last version of Debian that supports a Xen DomU with a patched kernel vs. pv_ops; in theory pv_ops DomU will be sufficiently solid by the following release. Doing a solid merge of the code even with the SUSE foundation is non-trivial (Xen supplies it as patches to 2.6.18). I pay attention to this because some of what I do is with or on Xen and Debian lenny was the best DomU solution for me when I started.

Cabal 16y ago
I think you meant forward-ported Dom0 patches. Lenny already supported DomU operation without modification.
- hga 16y ago
  Yes, yes, I spazzed 0 -> U. Thanks for the correction.