> I've seen plenty of advertisements for government services. >For basic things like roads? Ever listen to the radio?? The government has a lot of advertiseme

> I've seen plenty of advertisements for government services. >For basic things like roads? Ever listen to the radio?? The government has a lot of advertisements. Everything from "Make sure you have the correct child safety seat in your vehicle" to the standard "think before you drink" or don't beat your wife as well as the advertising of services that one should use.. You occasionally see them on late night TV, but you can often see them at times when children watch tv. > Will be replaced by the armed enforcement department. >I'd love to know your reasoning behind this i think is using historical references. However, govts have notoriously used force in some method or another. Imminent domain and civil assett forfeiture readily come to mind. Of course govt can use other methods including weaponizing it's agencies, e.g. the IRS and the FBI are historic examples, but one could imagine the FCC doing similar.. I understand that's difficult to grasp depending on your political persuasion. > There is but it is outsourced to the IRS or other department >Which cuts costs because they are already doing it and there is no increase in their workload I'm not even sure, are you serious about this??. Surely not. > Like it or not, access to the internet is a scarce resource >Yes, but you only need to assess health and ensure QoS levels are maintained. It's completely understandable to be throttled in peak load times and enjoy more resources off-peak. Again. This seems pretty short sighted. Tech changes, and it changes fast. The idea that we should enshrine some particular technology in place for the future is horrific in terms of future innovation. But more than this, i think we now have a fundamental misunderstanding of what a "right" is. I tend to think the end goal of such articles is the marginalization of the word, as has been done with other words such as rape..