3 ms·
I am sorry but do you mean companies should pay off a whistle-blower rather than say - a. litigate, if the claims are baseless b. In case the claim has substa
by thisisit 9y ago
I am sorry but do you mean companies should pay off a whistle-blower rather than say -
a. litigate, if the claims are baseless
b. In case the claim has substance to try and rectify the issue along with responsible disclosure?
- make3 9y agoif you have reason to think that praying off the guy will work during a huge public image crisis, it would be a very attractive option I'm sure. they should act morally, etc., that's not what I'm saying. I'm trying to extract the raw incentives of the situation
- DonHopkins 9y agoPray away the crime? Sounds like Pence's solution to the Russia scandal.
- woodandsteel 9y agoNo, that would just signal that other employees could earn a huge amount of money by making claims about illegal activity, true or not. I really doubt that any company could be so stupid as to get itself into that sort of situation.