4 ms·
>In other words, if you video has ads, then the probability of appearing in searches and related content is higher So users that permit ads on their video get
by danjoc 9y ago
>In other words, if you video has ads, then the probability of appearing in searches and related content is higher
So users that permit ads on their video get a virtual "fast lane" on the Comcast internet service. You know, I'm sick and tired of these internet service providers violating Net Neutrality principles.
Oh, wait. It's YouTube? Oh, that's fine then./s
- delecti 9y agoYoutube not providing extra promotion for content is different from Comcast charging extra to even access that content.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- cerebellum42 9y agoNot permitting ads from the user's end doesn't even influence the ranking and likelihood of showing up in recommendations (as far as we know). It's just demonetization from Youtube's side that has that effect.
- jowsie 9y agoYou do realise you're comparing a company that makes its money from advertising on top of an otherwise video sharing platform, with a company you pay a fixed monthly fee to access the internet, right?
- danjoc 9y ago>a company that makes its money from advertising on top of an otherwise video sharing platform I know you meant YouTube, but that describes Comcast cable TV service as well. YouTube is a competitor. Should Comcast be forced to deliver a competitor's content? >with a company you pay a fixed monthly fee to access the internet Some parts of the internet. You don't get the "whole" internet. You've had limited internet and fast/slow lanes for decades. http://www.newsgroupreviews.com/comcast-newsgroups.html http://www.newsgroupreviews.com/comcast-newsgroups.html https://www.xfinity.com/support/internet/list-of-blocked-ports/ https://www.xfinity.com/support/internet/list-of-blocked-por... https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Asymmetrical_Internet_Access https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Asymmetrical_Internet_Access