3 ms·
While your misunderstanding of the comment may be a genuine mistake, your comment could be considered "straw man garbage" itself. Your tone is condescending and
by Spare_account 9y ago
While your misunderstanding of the comment may be a genuine mistake, your comment could be considered "straw man garbage" itself. Your tone is condescending and you might want to consider re-phrasing.
The post you're replying to is suggesting that removal from Google results _should_ be part of US law. Perhaps the impact of Google is such that there should be legislation regulating Google's behaviour.
In the UK we have a public phone book maintained by British Telecom. I can opt out of the phone book but BT cannot choose not to include me if I've opted IN. BT is a private company but this one aspect of their output is regulated by law.
The difference between a private company selling a service and something considered an essential utility is legislation, presumably?
- erik_seaberg 9y agoBT doesn't need to decide which people are important enough to appear on page one. Google earned their position by doing just that—by being dramatically better than an unordered list of all web pages containing your substring.