What bugs me about this story and the conclusions is that it tries to compare taste--something wholly subjective--to other things. It implies that people use th

What bugs me about this story and the conclusions is that it tries to compare taste--something wholly subjective--to other things. It implies that people use the same criteria of judgment for everything, which isn't even addressed by the study. How we judge our food doesn't necessarily reflect how we judge more important things like our political and social views. Has a similar study been done for those subjects? This is the worst kind of science reporting because it's trying to take a single study and draw wildly unrelated conclusions.