1. Stiglitz is effectively calling for perpetuating the surveillance state - one with no privacy, no strong encryption. How else can you ultimately stop cryptoc

1. Stiglitz is effectively calling for perpetuating the surveillance state - one with no privacy, no strong encryption. How else can you ultimately stop cryptocurrencies? 2. Does Joseph Stiglitz have a right to exist, even though his social utility is low? After all, he is quite old, has already done the work recognized in his Nobel prize and is unlikely to be of further use to society. Utilitarians will undoubtedly disagree with me here, but I assert that each of us has the right to trade communicate freely with one another, and to write and maintain whatever programs we wish to.