this could also be understood as the inherent shortcomings of photography as a medium to capture your recollection of the experience of an event. or in another

this could also be understood as the inherent shortcomings of photography as a medium to capture your recollection of the experience of an event. or in another way, photography exposes the difficulty of translating your recollection to a third party. when I show you a grainy photo of some bright lights and blurred, sweaty people, I remember a great concert with friends.. but you just see the grainy photo. though I agree with what you are saying, I think this is just the mass adoption of the imagification (both actual and meta) of life that began with portraiture back in the middle ages. why rail against snapchat when we already live in a world of fake family portraits?