4 ms·
> My guess is the people who have such black and white views haven't ever been tasked with marketing a product in a true professional capacity This is so, so t
by sjbase 9y ago
> My guess is the people who have such black and white views haven't ever been tasked with marketing a product in a true professional capacity
This is so, so true and in such a broad way. I've had this thought gnawing at me for ages that these people who are doing seemingly evil things (think James Comey, Ajit Pai) have likely been tested in ways I never have. Who knows how I would handle being in their situation? I don't think it excuses or absolves true wrongdoing, but it does give me some sympathy or at least reasonable doubt of malice. This an elementary concept, but it never seems to get mentioned.
To be clear, I'm not one of the people who categorically hates your profession. I'm an advocate of privacy, I avoid most types of social media, use uBlock, etc. But I can see it being hard to figure out where the line is, and how to not cross it. I've never worked in the consumer/media/ads world and had to face the "what to track" dilemma head-on.
- blub 9y agoYou can turn that argument on its head: you've never worked in consumer/media/ads because it's an abusive industry which self-selects for certain types of individuals that don't care about the privacy of others. Nowadays they notice the public's displeasure and feel obliged to pay some lip-service, right before going back to abusing the trust of their customers. I understand it's hard for marketing professionals to resist with so much pressure coming at them. That's why I think they should be supported by laws forbidding their abusive practices. Then it should be much easier to say no. Bonus: shostack wouldn't be bothered by all that cognitive dissonance.