3 ms·
The web was still pretty grown up in 2001 - admittedly no facebook or twitter; the idea of immediate spread of information through non-traditional routes was no
by user24 16y ago
The web was still pretty grown up in 2001 - admittedly no facebook or twitter; the idea of immediate spread of information through non-traditional routes was not widespread.
I checked cnn and bbc news for information (both of which went down several times that day I might add)
But I really doubt twitter would stay up if a 9/11-scale event happened today. Even facebook I'm not sure about. If the CNN site couldn't handle the traffic I can only imagine what that spike looked like.
"It wasn't possible to broadcast to all of your friends in a matter of seconds if you were okay in 2001."
well, there was - cell phones and SMS. Those networks went down too (source: http://www.continuitycentral.com/feature0153.htm http://www.continuitycentral.com/feature0153.htm )
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoSMS was certainly there, but nowhere near the usage that it has today.
- user24 16y agoHmm, apparently the UK were 4 years ahead of the US in terms of SMS adoption (source: http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/23/americans-are-4-years-behind-the-uk-in-terms-of-sms-adoption/ http://www.intomobile.com/2007/07/23/americans-are-4-years-b...) so maybe you're right. Certainly felt to me like SMS was well established in the UK in the 2000s.
- sanderjd 16y agoSMS and phone calls don't broadcast, that is the key difference.