3 ms·
Furthermore, as far as I understood, it would be impossible to change the Linux kernel license today because of the large number of people involved (also becaus
by ithkuil 16y ago
Furthermore, as far as I understood, it would be impossible to change the Linux kernel license today because of the large number of people involved (also because some authors are dead now).
Relicensing linux is not an option, whether you believe GPL is good or not.
There are solutions to this, but you have to act in advance: for example if you want to contribute code to the clojure open source project, you have to sign and send by snail mail a contributor agreement (http://clojure.org/space/showimage/ca.pdf http://clojure.org/space/showimage/ca.pdf) which regulates the ability of the project funder some freedom in relicensing.
btw, this formality, especially the printing and snail mail thing, actually stopped me from contributing my code to clojure-contrib. You know, I just wanted to quickly share a bugfix, I don't know in advance how much involvement I will have with something which starts only as a side effect of my job
furthermore since I made the contribution during my daily job, my company itself would have to sign that contract etc etc, licensing some stuff with GPL is one thing, granting unrestricted sublicensing right is a different issue ...
- chrismsnz 16y agoCouldn't you contribute the code to a developer under public domain, meaning they can do whatever they want with it (relicense it etc...)?