5 ms·
Same price as google ($0.006 per 15 second increment) but more expensive that microsft ($0.004 per 15 second increment). However, this does charge by the secon
by mrep 9y ago
Same price as google ($0.006 per 15 second increment) but more expensive that microsft ($0.004 per 15 second increment). However, this does charge by the second after 15 seconds which is nice.
I just wish they would lower the minimum threshold of 15 second intervals.
- dvfjsdhgfv 9y agoIs the quality so much better than CMU Sphinx that it's worth paying for it?
- mrep 9y agoAccording to others, yes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11820837 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11820837
- nmcfarl 9y agoFrom personal experience we can get pretty good results on our workflow from sphinx - but the amount of time it took to get those results was massive, and spread over years. It's probably worth it for most organizations to skip that and go for a vendor. Results from Amazon are an unknown right now, but the other vendors vary a good bit and are focused on particular kinds of audio (kinds vary by: the number of speakers, the duration of the audio, the vocabulary, language).
- jstandard 9y agoYes. I've tried Sphinx implementations twice over the past few years. Google Cloud Speech and Nuance blew it out of the water. It partially depends on dictionary size and the need for continuous recognition, but generally speaking there's a big divide between open source and paid services.