4 ms·
> They could see the end of their short hours, high pay, minimal work jobs that had been passed down father to son. Why were the papers willing to pay for that
by Bromskloss 9y ago
> They could see the end of their short hours, high pay, minimal work jobs that had been passed down father to son.
Why were the papers willing to pay for that?
- lucozade 9y agoStrikes. The only thing more expensive than expensive printers is no printers. Printers' unions were very powerful. Maybe not as infamously as teamsters in the US or miners in the UK but definitely up there. Automation broke them in the 1980's but not without one hell of a struggle.