3 ms·
Well at least they don't have the gall to call it Autopilot which has connotations sufficient enough to lull a lot of people into believing a product already de
by Shivetya 9y ago
Well at least they don't have the gall to call it Autopilot which has connotations sufficient enough to lull a lot of people into believing a product already delivers more than it can and likely ever will.
the issue we face now is, who is leading and or taking charge of this space, how are they actually doing it, and which solution is the best.
with more players we might get lucky to see Level5 within a decade or two. AV is perceived by many in the same category as any safety equipment, be that as simple as a seat belt, or an airbag, or complex like ABS and traction control. As such it has to meet a much higher standard.
GM has recently shown they can move in any direction they want and very quickly. The managed to launch a relatively affordable 200 mile range EV in short order with no availability issues other than an on purpose staggered release.
why would any of the existing automakers cede any innovative technologies and why would we not celebrate all of them trying
- undersuit 9y agoI don't know where those connotations came from. Any basic understanding of autopilot functions in existing vehicles, like airplanes, makes it immediately obvious how limited in function autopilot is.
- notfed 9y agoMost people don't have a basic understanding of how autopilot works in airplanes.