The existence of counterexamples isn’t that notable here. OPs position is “dogs are only in it for the food.” Dogs that are not only in it for the food are a u

The existence of counterexamples isn’t that notable here. OPs position is “dogs are only in it for the food.” Dogs that are not only in it for the food are a useful counterexample, because it trumps the sweeping “only.” That -some- dogs are in it for the food doesn’t move the needle in the debate one way or the other.