3 ms·
> It was good enough that people were willing to pay for it > We also didn't have the funds to develop or keep testing it I have to wonder, why did these not
by corobo 9y ago
> It was good enough that people were willing to pay for it
> We also didn't have the funds to develop or keep testing it
I have to wonder, why did these not cancel each other out?
- k1ns 9y agoThey mentioned that they weren't confident enough in the system to sell it, which is a shame because it sounds like an awesome service/opportunity.
- muzani 9y agoIt takes a while to go from 98% confident to 99.9%. And a lot of refactoring. Internal tools can be really sloppy, especially when we were selling like 3 items a day. Something that's paid for and trusted to manage several million dollars worth of inventory has to be a lot more robust. Investors didn't like the idea. I guess we didn't sell it well as one of them invested in someone else doing the same thing but with less experience.