2 ms·
≥That's a very engineer-oriented approach, but it misses that the current crisis (can we call it that) is social. I've been trying to harp on this point for a
by kadenshep 9y ago
≥That's a very engineer-oriented approach, but it misses that the current crisis (can we call it that) is social.
I've been trying to harp on this point for a while. Any proposed changes to how our government functions and how representatives gets elected isnt going to work because it's addressing something that isn't causing the problems we're seeing. The problem IS the electorate and the choices the electorate is making under its own will.
We are here, because the electorate chose to be. And the portion of the electorate that seems perfectly willing to make uninformed or irrational choices isn't exactly small, and often only counts as a technical "minority" when compared to the over all population.
You might alleviate the problem at best, and most likely only temporarily with any proposed changes. Every change that's been proposed in these discussions always assumes that the presence and amount of rational actors is sufficient, if not the norm. That's not what we currently see.