3 ms·
Wait, can't we do the same? I mean, make money exploiting legal loopholes at the cost of Chinese people and government? After all, the borders work two ways.
by curtisblaine 9y ago
Wait, can't we do the same? I mean, make money exploiting legal loopholes at the cost of Chinese people and government? After all, the borders work two ways.
- tyingq 9y agoWe don't get the dirt cheap UPU subsidized shipping rates the opposite direction. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439532/us-postal-service-subsidizes-china-other-countries-it-shouldnt http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439532/us-postal-servi...
- sverhagen 9y agoWait, what? Are we upset with China then? So that we want to target innocent Chinese people? As the article clearly states: it's illegal in China too. Is disrespecting the personal mailing address of a random, innocent Chinese person less valuable than the personal mailing address of a random, innocent American? Unless you have personal mailing addresses lying around of the specific people who are brushing the system from China now? But then... while the article talks about stuff being sent from China, I didn't get the idea that it necessarily had to be (exclusively) Chinese people who did it?
- curtisblaine 9y agoNo, I was just wondering if these border loopholes were one-way or could be played from West to East, too.