3 ms·
Your comment suggests that it is related to users with older, pre-High Sierra directory entries. That is, upgraded rather than freshly installed machines that l
by arghwhat 9y ago
Your comment suggests that it is related to users with older, pre-High Sierra directory entries. That is, upgraded rather than freshly installed machines that leave older, pre-ShadowHashData intact. Is this correct?
- Asmod4n 9y agoWorks with El Capitan too.
- jsmthrowaway 9y agoNo, I reproduced on freshly-installed High Sierra on two machines.
- arghwhat 9y agoOdd. No reasonable amount of attempts would reproduce it on my wife's few-weeks-old work machine, where the root user was visibly disabled. The factors that differed from my laptop, where it worked until I set a root password, as that her machine was a fresh install, and she is not admin (a managed machine).
- AdamJacobMuller 9y agoNo, sorry, I did not mean that or mean to imply it. I think the feature that caused this is related to upgrading pre-high-sierra user password hashes to high-sierra-style hashes. The fact that it works for situations where the password is null is a/the bug.
- arghwhat 9y agoAh, yes, but that is what I meant in suggesting that it was related to a High Sierra upgrade. If we assume that ShadowHashData hash was introduced in High Sierra, I thought it was safe to assume that a crypt hash would only origin from a pre-High Sierra install. Unless, of course, they are used as some form of default value (such as when disabling the user)...