So the author is saying "look at this thing which people say violates net neutrality but not the net neutrality regulations as written" and uses that as an argu

So the author is saying "look at this thing which people say violates net neutrality but not the net neutrality regulations as written" and uses that as an argument to get rid of the net neutrality regulations altogether? Does this make sense to anyone else? Zero rating is equivalent to charging more for non-zero-rated bandwidth.