An article completly broken by it's fundamental assumption; a NN internet is some how more expensive than a non NN one. What impossible regulatory burden is th

An article completly broken by it's fundamental assumption; a NN internet is some how more expensive than a non NN one. What impossible regulatory burden is the FCC really applying to the poor ISPs? The reason NN has been the default for all these decades is it's more work to manually inspect packets to provide these artificial tiers of service and the ISP gravy train is way too good as it is to risk exposing their monopolies to consumer outrage. The internet is a utility as much as electricity, and yet you don't see the power companies saying it's important for ~competition~ to charge variable rates for your power delivery (though, recent advances means this is possible so, once NN is killed expect Grid Neutrality to be next). Sacrifice the internet for profit for all I care, just don't fucking try to say it's a good thing for consumers.