3 ms·
I get your point but a non-breaking breakpoint sounds like a contradiction. Maybe it should be called a tracepoint?
by ChrisSD 9y ago
I get your point but a non-breaking breakpoint sounds like a contradiction. Maybe it should be called a tracepoint?
- masklinn 9y agoTechnically sure, but that makes it less discoverable as developers tend to look for breakpoints rather than tracepoints. So UX/discovery-wise adding these features as advanced extensions of breakpoints is more sensible than breakpoints being a special case of tracepoints.