2 ms·
Correct. The actual ruling was that the photos taken by the photographer (Ets-Hokin) were copyrighted. https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/225_f3d_1068
by balls187 9y ago
Correct. The actual ruling was that the photos taken by the photographer (Ets-Hokin) were copyrighted.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/225_f3d_1068.htm https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/225_f3d_1068.htm